Posts
Dealing With Hostile People: Why Most Training Gets It Dead Wrong
Related Articles:
If someone told me fifteen years ago that I'd be teaching people how to handle hostile colleagues, I would've laughed and suggested they find a therapist instead. Back then, I thought workplace hostility was just personality clashes that sorted themselves out. How wrong I was.
The turning point came during a particularly brutal project in Perth where a senior manager screamed at my team lead for twenty minutes straight. Not raised voice. Not firm words. Full-blown, red-faced, vein-popping screaming. The entire office went silent. Our best performer handed in her resignation that afternoon.
That's when I realised something most HR departments refuse to acknowledge: traditional hostility training is fundamentally broken.
The Problem With Feel-Good Solutions
Most workplace hostility programmes focus on de-escalation techniques and "understanding the other person's perspective." Complete rubbish. You know what understanding a bully's perspective gets you? More bullying.
Here's my controversial take: some people are just arseholes, and no amount of active listening or empathetic responses will change that fact. The sooner we accept this reality, the sooner we can develop strategies that actually work.
I've seen countless Melbourne businesses waste thousands on conflict resolution training that teaches employees to "validate feelings" and "find common ground." Meanwhile, the hostile person continues their behaviour because they've learned the system rewards them for it.
What Actually Works (And Why Nobody Wants to Hear It)
Real hostility management isn't about changing the hostile person - it's about protecting everyone else from them. This means clear boundaries, documented incidents, and consequences that actually stick.
The most effective approach I've developed involves what I call "tactical indifference." You acknowledge the hostile behaviour without engaging emotionally. You document everything. You follow up in writing. You make their hostility expensive for them and the organisation.
Does this sound harsh? Absolutely. Does it work? Every single time.
I learned this approach from watching how Qantas flight attendants handle difficult passengers. They don't try to make friends with someone having a meltdown at 30,000 feet. They have protocols. Clear escalation procedures. And backup plans that prioritise everyone else's safety and wellbeing.
The Business Case Nobody Talks About
Here's what really gets me fired up: hostile employees cost Australian businesses approximately $6.2 billion annually in lost productivity, increased sick leave, and staff turnover. Yet most companies treat it like a minor HR issue rather than the financial emergency it actually is.
One Brisbane manufacturing company I worked with was haemorrhaging good staff from one department. Turnover was 180% annually. The problem? One senior technician who'd been there for twelve years and knew exactly how to make people's lives miserable without crossing any obvious lines.
Management kept trying to "coach" him. They sent him to anger management courses. They tried mediation sessions. They even restructured the entire department around his behaviour patterns.
The solution ended up being breathtakingly simple: they changed his role to one with minimal people contact and hired a proper team leader. Turnover dropped to 15% within six months. Productivity increased by 40%. The hostile employee actually became decent at his new role because he wasn't constantly managing people he clearly couldn't stand.
Why Traditional Training Fails
Most hostility training assumes everyone wants to get along. This is naive beyond belief. Some people thrive on conflict. Others use hostility as a power tool. A few are genuinely struggling with personal issues, but that's HR's problem, not their colleagues' responsibility to manage.
The worst training programmes actually enable hostile behaviour by teaching targets to "understand" and "accommodate" rather than protect themselves and their teams.
I remember one Sydney workshop where they role-played scenarios with a hostile colleague. The facilitator kept pushing participants to find compromises and build bridges. Real life doesn't work like that. Sometimes the bridge needs to be burned, and someone needs professional help or a different job.
The Real Skills Nobody Teaches
Effective hostility management requires skills they don't teach in most programmes:
Strategic documentation: Not just noting what happened, but understanding what constitutes actionable evidence versus workplace personality differences.
Emotional firewalling: Learning to completely disconnect your self-worth from someone else's behaviour. This isn't the same as not caring - it's protecting your mental health while remaining professional.
Alliance building: Identifying other people affected by the hostile behaviour and creating informal support networks. Hostile people rarely target just one person.
Escalation timing: Knowing when to handle something directly versus when to involve management. Too early and you look like you can't handle conflict. Too late and the behaviour becomes entrenched.
The best managers I know can shut down hostile behaviour with a single conversation. Not through empathy or understanding, but through clear consequences and unwavering consistency.
What Companies Should Actually Do
First, stop hiring hostile people. I know this sounds obvious, but most interview processes focus on technical skills while ignoring clear red flags around how candidates treat reception staff or discuss former colleagues.
Second, create systems that make hostility expensive. Document everything. Follow up conversations with emails. Track the business impact of hostile behaviour and present it in dollar terms that executives understand.
Third, protect your good people. High performers shouldn't have to manage someone else's emotional dysfunction. If you're asking your best staff to "work around" a hostile colleague, you're essentially punishing excellence while rewarding bad behaviour.
BHP figured this out years ago in their mining operations. They realised that one hostile team member could create safety risks for everyone underground. Their approach? Zero tolerance policies with clear, escalating consequences. No mediation. No second chances for serious incidents. Just professional accountability.
The Uncomfortable Truth
Most organisations know exactly who their hostile people are. They've known for years. The problem isn't identification - it's action. Companies would rather spend money on training everyone else to cope rather than address the root cause.
This is backwards thinking that costs more money and creates worse outcomes for everyone involved.
I've been managing difficult conversations professionally for over a decade now, and the patterns are always the same. The hostile person has learned that their behaviour works. Other people adapt, compromise, or leave. Management avoids confrontation. The cycle continues.
Breaking this cycle requires courage from leadership and systems that prioritise organisational health over individual accommodation.
The most successful interventions I've seen focus on changing organisational responses rather than changing hostile individuals. Because here's the thing - you can't train someone to be a decent human being if they don't want to be one.
But you can definitely train an organisation to stop enabling bad behaviour. And that's where the real transformation happens.
Other Blogs of Interest: